Cracking Patterns of Brittle Hemispherical Domes: an Experimental Study

Authors

  • Siwen Cao Dept. Mechanics, Materials and Structures, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
  • Andras A. Sipos Dept. Morphology and Geometric Modeling & MTA-BME Morphodynamics Research Group, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0440-2165

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.59.20

Keywords:

Cracking pattern, Brittle material, Hemispherical dome, Evolution, Experimental study

Abstract

Crack formation in hemispherical domes is a distinguished problem in structural mechanics. The safety of cracked domes has a long track record; the evolution of the cracking pattern received less attention. Here, we report displacement-controlled loading tests of brittle hemispherical dome specimens, including the evolution of the meridional cracking pattern. The 27 investigated specimens, 20 cm in diameter, were prepared in 3D printed molds, and their material is one of the three mixtures of gypsum and cement. We find that neither the (limited) tensile strength nor the exact value of the thickness significantly affects the statistical description of the cracking pattern, i.e., the cracking phenomenon is robust. The maximal number of the meridional cracks never exceeds seven before the fragments’ disintegration (collapse). We find that the size distribution of the fragments exhibits a lognormal distribution. The evolution is reflected in the load-displacement diagrams recorded in the test, too, as significant drops in the force are accompanied by an emergence of one or more new cracks, reflecting the brittle nature of the phenomenon. A simple, stochastic fragmentation model, in which a segment is fragmented at either in the middle or at the fourth point, fairly recovers the observed size distribution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

22-12-2021

How to Cite

Cracking Patterns of Brittle Hemispherical Domes: an Experimental Study. (2021). Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale, 16(59), 265-310. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.59.20