Effect of surface treatment on the fatigue strength of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy

Authors

  • Carlos Navarro Pintado University of Seville, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7418-9411
  • Jesús Vázquez University of Seville, Spain
  • Jaime Domínguez University of Seville, Spain
  • Antonio Periñán Advanced Center for Aerospace Technologies (CATEC), Seville, Spain
  • Marta Herrera García Advanced Center for Aerospace Technologies (CATEC), Seville, Spain
  • Fernando Lasagni Advanced Center for Aerospace Technologies (CATEC), Seville, Spain
  • Simon Bernarding University of Saarlandes, Germany
  • Sebastian Slawik University of Saarlandes, Germany
  • Frank Mücklich University of Saarlandes, Germany
  • Francisco Boby Curtiss Wright Surface Technologies, Metal Improvement Company, Seville, Spain
  • Lloyd Hackel Curtiss Wright Surface Technologies, Metal Improvement Company, Seville, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.26

Keywords:

Additive manufacturing, fatigue strength of AM elements, shot peening, laser shock peening, superfinishing, fatigue strength improvement

Abstract

Different alloys can be used for Additive Manufacturing (AM) with good structural strength. Among the titanium alloys, Ti6Al4V is the most used, especially for aerospace applications. There have been many analyses of the mechanical properties of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V with very good static strength results in general. However, there are still some difficulties to get fatigue properties close enough to the ones of specimens manufactured using traditional processes

Considering the high effect of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of  AM specimens, this work deals with the effect produced by some surface treatments on the fatigue properties. Five treatments have been used for comparison. All specimens were annealed previously to reduce residual stresses, as well as sand blasted to reduce the roughness. The treatments considered are: 1) no treatment after annealing and sand blasting; 2) shot peening; 3) shot peening plus Chemical Assisted Surface Enhancement (CASE); 4) laser shock peening, and 5) HIP. After fatigue testing, a comparison of the results has been carried out. It was found that laser peening produced the best results, followed by shot peening plus CASE and shot peening, with the lowest strength produced by HIP as well as just sand blasting after thermal treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

19-07-2020

How to Cite

Effect of surface treatment on the fatigue strength of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. (2020). Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale, 14(53), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.26