Implementation of fatigue model for unidirectional laminate based on finite element analysis: theory and practice

Authors

  • D. Carrella-Payan
  • B. Magneville
  • M. Hack
  • C. Lequesne
  • T. Naito
  • Y. Urushiyama
  • W. Yamazaki
  • T. Yokozeki
  • W. Van Paepegem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.38.25

Keywords:

Composite, Fatigue, Variable Amplitude, Stiffness degradation

Abstract

The aim of this study is to deal with the simulation of intralaminar fatigue damage in unidirectional composite under multi-axial and variable amplitude loadings. The variable amplitude and multi-axial loading is accounted for by using the damage hysteresis operator based on Brokate method [6]. The proposed damage model for fatigue is based on stiffness degradation laws from Van Paepegem combined with the ‘damage’ cycle jump approach extended to deal with unidirectional carbon fibres. The parameter identification method is here presented and parameter sensitivities are discussed. The initial static damage of the material is accounted for by using the Ladevèze damage model and the permanent shear strain accumulation based on Van Paepegem’s formulation. This approach is implemented into commercial software (Siemens PLM). The validation case is run on a bending test coupon (with arbitrary stacking sequence and load level) in order to minimise the risk of inter-laminar damages. This intra-laminar fatigue damage model combined efficient methods with a low number of tests to identify the parameters of the stiffness degradation law, this overall procedure for fatigue life prediction is demonstrated to be cost efficient at industrial level. This work concludes on the next challenges to be addressed (validation tests, multiple-loadings validation, failure criteria, inter-laminar damages…). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

03-10-2016

How to Cite

Implementation of fatigue model for unidirectional laminate based on finite element analysis: theory and practice. (2016). Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale, 10(38), Pages 184-190. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.38.25

Most read articles by the same author(s)